Paper 2026-21

ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ИЗКУСТВЕН ИНТЕЛЕКТ ЗА СЪЗДАВАНЕ НА МИКРОАНАЛИЗ НА ПЕДАГОГИЧЕСКИ ПОНЯТИЯ

Надя Емилова Коцева
Великотърновски университет „Св. св. Кирил и Методий“, Филиал – Враца

THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN WRITING MICROANALYSES OF PEDAGOGICAL CONCEPTS

Nadya Emilova Kotseva, PhD
St. Cyril and St. Methodius University of Veliko Tarnovo, Vratsa Branch

* Авторът изказват благодарност към научен проект: „Изкуственият интелект във висшето образование – предизвикателства, перспективи и възможности“ по договор № ФСД-31-354-1/28.04.2026г.

Abstract: The article presents a comparative study of different approaches to writing a microanalysis of pedagogical concepts by students of preschool pedagogy. The aim is to examine how the use of artificial intelligence influences the quality of academic writing. The study involves 45 students divided into three groups: students using artificial intelligence, students working without technological support, and students applying a combined approach. The analysis of the students’ texts is based on criteria related to clarity of definition, argumentation, practical example, text structure, and language accuracy. The results show that the highest achievements are observed among students who apply a combined approach. The findings suggest that artificial intelligence can support academic writing when used as a tool that complements students’ independent thinking.

Keywords: preschool pedagogy; artificial intelligence; academic writing; pedagogical concepts; microanalysis

References:

  1. Andreev, M., Didaktika. Sofia: Universitetsko izdatelstvo „Sv. Kliment Ohridski“, 1996.
  2. Petkov, P., Fasilitirane v obuchenieto. Obrazovanie i tehnologii, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 255–258, 2023.
  3. Angelov, M., Muzikalnotvorcheskata deynost pri obuchenieto na studentite – badeshti nachalni uchiteli. In: Nauka, obrazovanie i inovatsii v oblastta na izkustvoto. Sbornik s dokladi ot II Mezhdunarodna nauchna konferentsiya, Plovdiv, 24–26 October 2019. Plovdiv: Akademiya za muzikalno, tantsovo i izobrazitelno izkustvo „Prof. Asen Diamandiev“, pp. 133–139, 2019.
  4. Kotseva, N., Pedagogicheski naglasi na uchitelite za kulturnata osaznatost na detsata ot preduchilishtna vazrast. In: Edinadeseta nauchna doktorantska sesiya, Pedagogicheski fakultet, VTU „Sv. sv. Kiril i Metodiy“, 2024.
  5. Vygotsky, L. S., Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
  6. Siemens, G., Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2005.
  7. Baev, D., Tosheva, Ts., Variativni otnosheniya mezhdu nagledno-obrazno i shematichno mislene pri reshavane na poznavatelni zadachi. In: Sbornik dokladi ot godishna universitetska nauchna konferentsiya. Veliko Tarnovo: VTU „Sv. sv. Kiril i Metodiy“, pp. 487–494, 2021.
  8. Angelov, Marian. Formi na praktichesko obuchenie na stazhant-uchiteli: vazmozhnosti za realizirane na uchebnoto sadarzhanie po muzika v nachalnoto uchilishte, „Obrazovanie i tehnologii“, V. 16, No 1, pp. 166-171, 2025.
READ FULL PAPER